USPTO serial 77391383
C CITY BUILDERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHUO, EMILY M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with C CITY BUILDERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph J. Santaniello, Esq.
JOSEPH J. SANTANIELLO, ESQ. SHUMAKER, LOOP & KENDRICK, LLP128 S TRYON STREETSUITE 1800CHARLOTTE, NC 28202-5013Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Building construction and repair; commercial drywall contractor services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 26, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 20, 2008 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |