USPTO serial 77392737
DUST CONTROL SANDER PAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 31, 2009
- Examiner
- AQUILA, STEPHEN DAVID
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DUST CONTROL SANDER PAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
North Kansas City, MO
NORTH KANSAS CITY, MO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PENNY R. SLICER, REG. NO. 34,017
1201 WALNUT, SUITE 2900STINSON TRADEMARK ADMINISTRATORKANSAS CITY, MO 64106-2150Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | ABRASIVE PADS FOR SANDING ADAPTED FOR USE WITH ELECTRIC SANDERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | โ |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | โ |
| Oct 30, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | โ |
| Oct 30, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | โ |
| Mar 31, 2009 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 21, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | โ |
| Feb 21, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | โ |
| Feb 13, 2009 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | โ |
| Feb 13, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | โ |
| Feb 13, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | โ |
| Feb 13, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | โ |
| Feb 13, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | โ |
| Feb 6, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | โ |
| Feb 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Feb 6, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 9, 2009 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | โ |
| Jan 8, 2009 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | โ |
| Jan 8, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | โ |
| Jan 7, 2009 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | โ |
| Oct 17, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | โ |
| Oct 1, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Oct 1, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 11, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | โ |
| Jul 11, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | โ |
| Apr 28, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| Feb 13, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | โ |