USPTO serial 77393483
K-9 EODS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 24, 2009
- Examiner
- YOUNG, CARRIE SKYE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with K-9 EODS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
K-9 Enhanced Odor Detection Systems, LLP
Oak Ridge, TN
Other trademarks owned by K-9 Enhanced Odor Detection Systems, LLP
K-9 Enhanced Odor Detection Systems, LLP
Oak Ridge, TN
Other trademarks owned by K-9 Enhanced Odor Detection Systems, LLP
K-9 Enhanced Odor Detection Systems, Inc.
Oak Ridge, TN
Other trademarks owned by K-9 Enhanced Odor Detection Systems, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael E. Robinson
Michael E. Robinson ROBINSON IP LAW, PLLC9724 Kingston Pike, Suite 1102KNOXVILLE, TN 37922UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Prefabricated non-metal buildings | ACTIVE | Jul 25, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by K-9 Enhanced Odor Detection Systems, LLP
- Other trademarks owned by K-9 Enhanced Odor Detection Systems, LLP
- Other trademarks owned by K-9 Enhanced Odor Detection Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named K-9 EODS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 18, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 17, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 4, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 20, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 17, 2009 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | INOA | AMENDMENT AFTER NOA NOT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 10, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 21, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 27, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |