USPTO serial 77394990
SMILE HEALTHY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARCY, AMY ALFIERI
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMILE HEALTHY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jon O. Nelson
JON O. NELSON BANNER & WITCOFF, LTD.10 S WACKER DR STE 3000CHICAGO, IL 60606-7437UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | BOTTLED WATERS, NAMELY, SPRING WATER, AERATED WATER, ARTESIAN WELL WATER, FLAVORED CARBONATED WATER, BOTTLED WATER WITH ADDED MINERALS, ENHANCED WATER, FLAVORED WATER, HERBALLY ENHANCED WATER, OXYGENATED WATER, SPARKLING WATER, STRUCTURED WATER; FRUIT DRINKS AND FRUIT JUICES; VEGETABLE DRINKS AND VEGETABLE JUICES; OTHER NON-ALCOHOLIC DRINKS, NAMELY, ISOTONIC AND ENERGY DRINKS, SPORTS DRINKS, LOW CARB BEVERAGES, CARBONATED AND NON-CARBONATED FLAVORED BEVERAGES, VEGETABLE AND FRUIT JUICES AND DRINKS ENRICHED WITH VITAMINS; VEGETABLE AND FRUIT JUICES AND DRINKS ENRICHED WITH CALCIUM; MILK, SKIM MILK, CHEESE AND YOGURT; MILK PRODUCTS, NAMELY, YOGURT BASED BEVERAGES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF YOGURT WITH FRUIT JUICES OR VEGETABLE JUICES, PLAIN OR FLAVORED BEVERAGES COMPOSED MAINLY OF MILK OR MILK PRODUCTS; MILK BASED BEVERAGES CONTAINING FRUIT OR FRUIT JUICE; PRESERVED, DRIED AND COOKED FRUIT AND VEGETABLES; FRESH FRUIT AND VEGETABLES; LOW SUGAR, REDUCED SUGAR, AND SUGAR FREE CONFECTIONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 14, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 26, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 18, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 15, 2010 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 11, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 19, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 29, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 13, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 12, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 31, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |