USPTO serial 77396417
BERNARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARL III, FRED
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BERNARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer Zordani
Jennifer Zordani Ungaretti & Harris LLP70 West Madison StreetSuite 3500 - Attn: IP DocketChicago, IL 60602-4224Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Foods for medically restricted low sodium diets, low-fat diets, fat-free diets and sugar-free diets, namely, dry mix salt-free soup bases for treatment of hypertension, dry mix sugar-free gelatin, dry mix sugar-free pudding and sugar-free salad dressings for the treatment of diabetes | ACTIVE | Dec 18, 1947 |
| 020 | Novelty item, namely, empty cans containing dehydrated water | ACTIVE | Dec 12, 1962 |
| 029 | Soup bouillon powders and powdered soup bases; canned foods, namely, seafood, fish, meat and chicken; canned prepared dishes, namely, chili with and without meat, vegetable chop suey, meatless chow mein, Italian style vegetables, meat and poultry entrees; salad dressings; pizza pie cheese; fruit based cake fillings; egg powder and whole milk powder for baking purposes; dry sour cream mix, dry sour cream and chives mix, dry western ham omelette mix, dry scrambled egg with freeze-dried ham mix; unflavored vegetable aspic gelatin base; powder composed of pectins to which water and sugar are added to make fruit jellies; fruit preserves and jellies; processed low moisture vegetables; freeze-dried vegetables and freeze-dried vegetable mixes; low moisture cole slaw mix with dressing; mix for making a non-alcoholic egg nog; dry mix meat extender made of vegetable protein; whipped topping | ACTIVE | Dec 18, 1947 |
| 030 | Spaghetti and meatballs; Spanish rice; meatless ravioli and sauce; ravioli and meat sauce; meatless spaghetti; meatless sauces, excluding applesauce and cranberry sauce, and sauces containing meat; powdered gravy sauce mixes both meatless, meat, and poultry containing milk powder and seasoning of a spiced nature; breading mix for frying chicken; meat tenderizer; pizza pie mix comprised of dough mix and sauce mix; baking specialties, namely, cake mixes, pastry; cake icings, dry mixes, namely, flavored and sweetened gelatin desserts and gelatin dessert powders, puddings, custard mixes; mixes for making spumoni; liquid pancake syrup and dry pancake syrup; pancake mixes, French toast batter mix; mixes for making hot chocolate, cocoa and malted milk | ACTIVE | Feb 15, 1951 |
| 032 | dry mix powders to be added to water for making fruit-flavored soft drinks | ACTIVE | Feb 15, 1951 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bernard Food Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named BERNARD
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 20, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 11, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 1, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 3, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |