USPTO serial 77396474
SOLAR SAIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, SUSAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOLAR SAIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeromye V. Sartain
Jeromye V. Sartain Mind Law Firm, P.C.36 Executive Park, Suite 110Irvine, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely, T-shirts, polo shirts, blouses, tops, fashion knit shirts, button-down shirts, long-sleeve T-shirts, tank tops, caps, jackets, coats, vests, ponchos, sweaters, sweatshirts, clothing ties, gloves, shorts, swim shorts, swimsuits, pants, fishing waders, overalls, coveralls, clothing bibs, dresses, skirts, sweat pants, sweatbands, head bands, hat, belts, scarves, undergarments, socks, and footwear, but excluding all caps and hats featuring shaded translucent bills or otherwise suggestive or imitative of sunglasses, eyeglasses, or eyewear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 28, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 28, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 26, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 17, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2009 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 21, 2008 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 21, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |