USPTO serial 77396742
ECO RAIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SEVERSON, KAREN
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ECO RAIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Hunstetten, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John F. McNulty
JOHN F. MCNULTY PAUL & PAUL2000 MARKET STREETSUITE 2900PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Water piping systems, conduit installations and water distribution systems and installations composed primarily of plastic pipes and absorbent textiles; irrigation and drainage systems composed primarily of plastic pipes and absorbent textiles for large areas such as golf courses, gardens or parks, for surface and underground humidification and dehumidification of soil, erosion protection, soil fertilization, soil aeration, soil loosening, soil disinfection, water resource management, for greening of roofs and air conditioning of buildings | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Water hoses, not of metal; synthetic fiber threads not for textile use; plastic fibers not for textile use; yarns not for textile use; garden hoses; fabrics not for textile use, namely, absorbent fabric for storing water, not of metal; superabsorbers, namely, modified polyacrylate polymers used to retain water | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Building materials, namely, plastic pipe supports, not of metal; drainage elements, namely, drain pipes made of plastic not of metal; geotextiles, namely, fabric for water conduits, water distribution and water supply, except for rainwater collection | ACTIVE | — |
| 022 | Glass fibers, not for textile use, in particular water conduits, water distribution, water storage and water supply; mineral, cotton-wool, fleece and synthetic fibers, coconut fibers, textile fibers and flax fiber for water conduits, water distribution, water storage and water supply | ACTIVE | — |
| 023 | Fiberglass thread, not for textile use | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Water-permeable covering material, namely, geotextiles and non-woven fabrics for streets and pavements; cotton fabric, linen cloth, hemp fabrics, jute fabrics, fabrics and non-woven fabrics for water conduits, water distribution, water storage and water supply | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Maintenance of irrigation systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Planning and design for others in the field of irrigation systems; providing quality assurance services in the field of irrigation systems; providing documentation, namely, drafting regarding planning, design, and operation of irrigation systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Landscape design | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dietmar Haub
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Other trademarks in Class 023
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named ECO RAIN
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 23, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 5, 2012 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 5, 2012 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 19, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 19, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 30, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |