Drawing for ECO RAIN

USPTO serial 77396742

ECO RAIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SEVERSON, KAREN
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ECO RAIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John F. McNulty

JOHN F. MCNULTY PAUL & PAUL2000 MARKET STREETSUITE 2900PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Water piping systems, conduit installations and water distribution systems and installations composed primarily of plastic pipes and absorbent textiles; irrigation and drainage systems composed primarily of plastic pipes and absorbent textiles for large areas such as golf courses, gardens or parks, for surface and underground humidification and dehumidification of soil, erosion protection, soil fertilization, soil aeration, soil loosening, soil disinfection, water resource management, for greening of roofs and air conditioning of buildingsACTIVE—
017Water hoses, not of metal; synthetic fiber threads not for textile use; plastic fibers not for textile use; yarns not for textile use; garden hoses; fabrics not for textile use, namely, absorbent fabric for storing water, not of metal; superabsorbers, namely, modified polyacrylate polymers used to retain waterACTIVE—
019Building materials, namely, plastic pipe supports, not of metal; drainage elements, namely, drain pipes made of plastic not of metal; geotextiles, namely, fabric for water conduits, water distribution and water supply, except for rainwater collectionACTIVE—
022Glass fibers, not for textile use, in particular water conduits, water distribution, water storage and water supply; mineral, cotton-wool, fleece and synthetic fibers, coconut fibers, textile fibers and flax fiber for water conduits, water distribution, water storage and water supplyACTIVE—
023Fiberglass thread, not for textile useACTIVE—
024Water-permeable covering material, namely, geotextiles and non-woven fabrics for streets and pavements; cotton fabric, linen cloth, hemp fabrics, jute fabrics, fabrics and non-woven fabrics for water conduits, water distribution, water storage and water supplyACTIVE—
037Maintenance of irrigation systemsACTIVE—
042Planning and design for others in the field of irrigation systems; providing quality assurance services in the field of irrigation systems; providing documentation, namely, drafting regarding planning, design, and operation of irrigation systemsACTIVE—
044Landscape designACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 23, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 23, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 5, 2012CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 5, 2012CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 19, 2011ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 12, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 15, 2011CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 14, 2011CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 23, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 22, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 19, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 18, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 13, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 13, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 3, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2010CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 12, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 2, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 5, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 24, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 30, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 30, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 30, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 30, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 21, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 21, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 30, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 20, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance