USPTO serial 77396877
CHEENI KUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHEENI KUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Trisha A. Dore
TRISHA A. DORE ACCURPRO TRADEMARK SERVICES LLP401 WEST GEORGIA STREETSUITE 702VANCOUVER, B.C., V6B5A1Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Food products, namely, a rum ball like desert namely gulab jamun, confections, namely, mithai, milk based confections, namely, burfi, peda, gulabjamun, rasogolla, rasmalai, kalakand and cham-cham, milk and wheat based confection, namely, doda burfi, milk based confection with chocolate coating namely chocolate burfi, milk based fermented product namely shrikhand, yoghurt, namely, aamrakhand, rice pudding, namely, kheer, rice/wheat pudding, namely, phirni, cereal based pudding, namely, payasam, carrot fudge, namely, gajar halwa, milk based frozen confection, namely, kulfi, drinking yoghurt, namely, lassi, cashew nut based confection, namely, kaju burfi | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 27, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 29, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |