Drawing for DISCASSIST

USPTO serial 77396911

DISCASSIST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DISCASSIST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amy F. Divino

William H. Dippert ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLCU.S. Steel Tower - 600 Grant Street44th FloorPittsburgh, PA 15219-2788

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010A workstation with software for accurately planning and guiding a surgeon in implanting an artificial disc in a patient's spineACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 16, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 16, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 23, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Oct 22, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Oct 14, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Oct 14, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 16, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Apr 15, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Apr 13, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Apr 13, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 2, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Nov 2, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Oct 14, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Oct 14, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 14, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 20, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 31, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 15, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 5, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 4, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 3, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 3, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 3, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 5, 2008AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED
May 5, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 1, 2008PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Feb 21, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Feb 20, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance