USPTO serial 77397131
BUDDHA-BAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ESTRADA, LINDA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BUDDHA-BAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Farhad Novian
FARHAD NOVIAN NOVIAN & NOVIAN LLP1801 CENTURY PARK E STE 1201LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-2314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | Candles and perfumed candles | ACTIVE | — |
| 006 | small items of metal hardware, namely, hinges, door handles, door pulls and fasteners | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | cutlery, namely, serving utensils, knives, forks and spoons | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | furniture, mirrors, picture frames, all of wood, cork, reed, cane, wicker, horn, bone, ivory, whalebone, shell, amber, mother of pearl, meerschaum and substitutes for all these materials, or of plastics | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Textiles and textile goods not included in other classes, namely, bed top sheets, single and double bed sheets, mattress covers, pillow cases, woolen blankets, curtains, portieres, covers for seat cushions, towels, bath towels, handkerchiefs, table covers, namely, table cloths not of paper; textile goods not included in other classes, namely, burp cloths not of paper, cloth banners, cloth doilies, cloth flags, cloth labels, cloth napkins for removing make up, cloth used for wrapping goods, felt cloth, flax cloth, gummed waterproof cloth, silk cloth, textile wall hangings, namely, wall rugs, hanging rugs and cloth posters, traced cloths for embroidery, wash cloths, woolen cloth | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | Floor coverings namely, carpets, rugs, mats and matting, linoleum wood, bamboo; non-textile wall hangings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GEORGE V RESTAURATION
- Other trademarks owned by GEORGE V RESTAURATION
- Other trademarks owned by GEORGE V EATERTAINMENT
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Similar marks named BUDDHA-BAR
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 3, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 4, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 2, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 13, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 5, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 2, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 5, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 2, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 2, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 2, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 21, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 6, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 6, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |