USPTO serial 77397441
PIZZAGRAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4091252Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 24, 2012
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PIZZAGRAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Guilford, CT
Guilford, CT
Cheshire, CT
Cheshire, CT
Cheshire, CT
Oxford, CT
Oxford, CT
Oxford, CT
Guilford, CT
Wilmington, NC
Wilmington, NC
Wilmington, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael A. Blake
Michael A. Blake Law Office of Michael A. Blake95 High StSuite 5Milford, CT 06460Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | ordering by phone, in person, e-mail, or through the Internet of pizza | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 20, 2011 |
| 036 | payment of services of pizza by phone, in person, e-mail, or through the Internet | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 20, 2011 |
| 039 | delivery services of pizza that may be with or without a card bearing a message | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 20, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Randolph J. Danowski
- Other trademarks owned by Randolph J. Danowski
- Other trademarks owned by Holly Christine Danowski
- Other trademarks owned by Holly Christine Danowski
- Other trademarks owned by Holly Christine Danowski
- Other trademarks owned by Rudolph J. Danowski
- Other trademarks owned by Rudolph J. Danowski
- Other trademarks owned by Rudolph J. Danowski
- Other trademarks owned by Randolph J. Danowski
- Other trademarks owned by Beth Ann Falcone
- Other trademarks owned by Beth Ann Falcone
- Other trademarks owned by Beth Ann Falcone
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named PIZZAGRAM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 24, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 17, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 28, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 11, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 11, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 11, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 15, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 29, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 9, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 16, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 5, 2008 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 5, 2008 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 5, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 27, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |