USPTO serial 77397579
SHOPPABLE VIDEO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SHOPPABLE VIDEO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hidden Hills, CA
Hidden Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott W. Kelley
Scott W. Kelley KELLY LOWRY & KELLEY, LLP6320 CANOGA AVE STE 1650WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91367-7704UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | ON-LINE ADVERTISING ON COMPUTER COMMUNICATION NETWORKS BY MEANS OF OPT-IN ADVERTISING FOR INTEGRATING ONLINE CONTENT, INTERACTIVE ADVERTISING, PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION, PRODUCT PLACEMENT AND PRODUCT INTEGRATION | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | WEBSITE DESIGN UTILIZING OPT-IN ADVERTISING FOR INTEGRATING ONLINE CONTENT, INTERACTIVE ADVERTISING, PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION, PRODUCT PLACEMENT AND PRODUCT INTEGRATION; PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF ONLINE NON-DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE UTILIZING OPT-IN ADVERTISING FOR INTEGRATING ONLINE CONTENT, INTERACTIVE ADVERTISING, PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION, PRODUCT PLACEMENT AND PRODUCT INTEGRATION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2009 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 4, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 5, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 9, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2008 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |