Drawing for ELKINGTON SLOTDRAIN

USPTO serial 77397968

ELKINGTON SLOTDRAIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KHAN, ASMAT A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ELKINGTON SLOTDRAIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Denise I. Mroz

DENISE I. MROZ WOODCOCK WASHBURN LLP2929 ARCH STREETCIRA CENTRE, 12TH FLOORPHILADELPHIA, PA 19104-2891

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal manhole covers and manhole frames and metal drainage gratings; metal duct covers, metal inspection covers; metallic building materials used within drainage and sewer systems, namely, beams, pipe work, drains and cladding; metallic frames and covers used in drainage and sewer systems, namely manhole covers and sewer access covers; unwrought and partly wrought common metals, and their alloys; rolled and cast metal building materials, namely beams, rails, pipes, concrete reinforcing steels; metal castings; unwrought and partly wrought common metals and their alloys and drainage and sewer systems, apparatus and installations namely sewer pipes, drain, gutter, plumbing and sewer valves, sewer rods, sewer fittings, pipework couplings and accessories thereforeACTIVE—
019Non-metallic building materials, namely plaster, shingles, tiles, wood panels, glass fibre insulation, cladding for construction and building, lumber; drain, gutter, plumbing and sewer pipes; non-metallic manhole covers, and manhole frames, non-metallic drainage gratings, non-metallic inspection covers, namely manhole covers and duct covers providing below ground access to drainage and sewer systems, well covers, and duct covers; non-metallic drainage and sewer systems, apparatus and installations made therefrom, namely sewer pipes, drain, gutter, plumbing and sewer valves, sewer rods, sewer fittings, pipe work couplings; non metallic building and construction articles, namely bricks and concrete, glass, paving, and wood blocksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 17, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 15, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 16, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 16, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 16, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 28, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 28, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 31, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 22, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Feb 21, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance