USPTO serial 77398813
BLUE PETER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BLUE PETER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Melissa L. Heywood
MELISSA L. HEYWOOD RICHARDS BUELL SUTTON LLP401 WEST GEORGIA STREETSUITE 700VANCOUVER; BRITISH COLUMB, V6B5A1Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Wearing apparel, namely, shirts, T-shirts, pants, shorts, sweatshirts, sweatpants, tank tops, collared shirts, polo shirts, turtlenecks, golf shirts, sweaters, cardigans, trousers, boxer shorts, socks, vests, outdoor wear, namely, jackets, coats, rain jackets, wind resistant jackets and gloves, headwear, namely, hats, visors and caps, footwear, namely, shoes, boots and boating shoes, swimwear, namely, swim suits and swim trunks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 6, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 8, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 17, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 17, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |