Drawing for REGENERATION

USPTO serial 77400539

REGENERATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REGENERATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Abigail Rubinstein, Andrew Baum, Paul Fields, Robert S. Weisbein, Amy J. Benjamin, Eric A. Prager, Karin Segall and Laura J. Winston

Abigail Rubinstein and Paul Fields DARBY & DARBY P.C.P.O. Box 770, Church Street StationNew York, NY 10008-0770UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing an on-line computer database in the field of locating eco-friendly products, describing eco-friendly products, rating eco-friendly products, pricing eco-friendly products and comparing prices of eco-friendly products; providing consumer information and related news in the field of eco-friendly productsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 26, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 26, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 22, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 30, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 10, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 27, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 26, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 26, 2009DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
May 15, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
May 14, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
May 11, 2009DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
May 11, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 11, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 8, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 8, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 8, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 8, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
May 7, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 24, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Nov 24, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 24, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 4, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 4, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 4, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 5, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 25, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance