USPTO serial 77401182
AFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter J. Riebling
PETER J. RIEBLING KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP1025 THOMAS JEFFERSON ST., NWEAST LOBBY, SUITE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20007Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical and veterinary preparations, namely, medicaments in the form of topical creams and lotions, oral pills and tablets, and intravenous and intramuscular injections for the treatment of growth disorders, hematological disorders, metabolic disorders, autoimmune diseases, cancer and conditions associated with cancer, acromegaly, anemia, neutropenia, multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis or diabetes, bacterial or viral infectious or non infectious diseases, hepatitis and conditions associated with malnutrition, such as immune deficiency, tuberculosis, secondary amenorrhea and/or infertility; fungicides, herbicides; common cytokines including growth hormones, growth factors, interleukins, interferons, leptins, erythropoietins and tumor necrosis factors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 17, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 21, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |