USPTO serial 77401195
WHY REPIPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WHY REPIPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles F. Reidelbach, Jr.
Charles F. Reidelbach, Jr. Higgs, Fletcher & Mack, LLP401 West A StreetSuite 2600San Diego, CA 92101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | EPOXY GLUE FOR GENERAL BONDING AND REPAIR, EPOXY RESINS, PHENOLIC RESINS, POLYAMIDE RESINS, POLYESTER RESINS, POLYETHYLENE RESINS, POLYPROPYLENE RESINS, POLYSTYRENE RESINS, SYNTHETIC RESINS FOR USE IN A WIDE VARIETY OF INDUSTRIES AND APPLICATIONS | ABANDONED | — |
| 002 | RUST PRESERVATIVES IN THE NATURE OF A COATING, PAINTS, COATING COMPOSITIONS IN THE NATURE OF PAINT FOR USE IN A WIDE VARIETY OF INDUSTRIES AND APPLICATIONS, CORROSION INHIBITING PAINT TYPE COATINGS FOR COMMERCIAL MARINE USE, SYNTHETIC RESIN PAINTS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 18, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 2, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 14, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 3, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 29, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |