USPTO serial 77401985
CUBIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 6, 2013
- Examiner
- VAGHANI, MAYUR C
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with CUBIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Diego, CA, US
San Diego, CA, US
San Diego, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Chris L. Holt
Chris L. Holt Mughal Gaudry & Franklin PC1500 NW Bethany Blvd.Suite 200Beaverton, OR 97006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and software for processing, authorizing, and transferring data between point of sale devices and contactless smartcards; [ computer hardware and software for configuring and processing smartcards; ] transport ticketing computer hardware and software; computer software and hardware for the sale and purchase of tickets; electronic fare collection equipment sold as a unit, namely, smart cards and magnetic encoded cards containing programming for use with electronic fare collection, fare boxes, ticket machines, magnetic card processors, smart card readers, ticket processors, turnstiles, electronic control processors; software for financial analysis and accounting in the field of consumer spending; [ automated parking systems, namely, computer software to run parking fee collection devices and computer hardware, fare boxes, ticket machines, magnetic card processors, smart card readers, ticket processors, electronic control processors, smart cards and magnetic encoded cards containing programming for use with automated parking; personnel locator computer hardware and software; ] combat simulators for training purposes; training systems for aircraft, vehicles, weapons and personnel in live, constructive and virtual environments consisting of transceivers, lasers not for medical use, GPS technology in the nature of a global positioning system, data link technology in the nature of electronic and optical communications instruments and components, namely, optical data links, electronic encryption units, radio frequency identification tag readers, wireless communication transponders and radio receivers; computer hardware, electronic display interfaces; computer software for tracking people and vehicles, collecting recording and replaying instrumentation data, providing automated processing and analysis of instrumentation data, computer networking, monitoring hit/miss notifications, scoring the outcome of weapons engagements and simulations of kinetic and non-kinetic threat weapons systems; electronic apparatus for tracking people and vehicles, collecting, recording and replaying instrumentation data, providing automated processing and analysis of instrumentation data, networking, monitoring hit/miss notifications, scoring the outcome of weapons engagements and simulations of kinetic and non-kinetic threat weapons systems; computer peripheral equipment for tracking people and vehicles, collecting, recording and replaying instrumentation data, providing automated processing and analysis of instrumentation data, computer networking, monitoring hit/miss notifications, scoring the outcome of weapons engagements and simulations of kinetic and non-kinetic threat weapons systems, all of the foregoing for education, training development, management support, and operations and maintenance support; communication and electronic products for intelligence, surveillance, search-and-rescue, air traffic control and military/civil communication markets consisting of radio and optical data links for transferring radar, video, and other information obtained via sensors; [ radios; radio, electronic optical and mobile data transmitters; radio receivers, filters, and exciters; high power amplifiers, antennas, direction-finding transponders and radio receivers, computers, computer display screens and monitors and software to transmit, network, detect, intercept, analyze, distribute and process intelligence and communications signals; computer hardware and software for surveillance; electronic communications computer hardware and software, transponders and radio receivers; computer hardware and software, transponders and radio receivers for use with shelters and unmanned aerial vehicles; computer hardware and software for the delivery of air-to-air, air-to-ground, air-to-water, ground-to-ground and ground-to-water missiles; ] computer hardware and software for the simulation of, and real time dissemination and display of the delivery of surveillance apparatus and explosives; automatic fare collection systems for rail, bus and parking lots sold as a unit, consisting of encoded smart cards containing programming for fare collection, magnetic encoded cards containing programming for fair collection, card production machines used to produce the foregoing encoded smart cards and magnetic encoded cards, pay stations, ticket issuing and validating machines, electronic processors of smart cards and tickets and payments, electronic point of sale devices, smart card readers, fare boxes, entry/exit terminals, entry/exit gates, and wireless communication transponders and radio receivers [ ; computer hardware and software for transit and parking financial analysis and accounting, motion sensors, anti-intrusion alarms and fire alarms, cameras, audio and video recorders, and explosives detectors for security ] | ACTIVE | Oct 2, 1950 |
| 037 | consulting services with regard to the installation and maintenance of electronic fare collection systems; [ consulting related to the installation and maintenance of computer hardware related to smartcards and computer hardware related to the sale and purchase of tickets; ] computer hardware technical support services for the installation and maintenance of combat simulation training systems, weapons effects analysis systems, and weapons simulation systems; computer hardware technical support services for the maintenance of automatic fare collection systems for rail, bus [, and parking lots; consulting related to the installation and maintenance of computer hardware systems for processing, authorizing and transferring data between point of sale devices and contactless smartcards ] | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1998 |
| 039 | Consulting services in the field of automated parking systems and public transportation | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1998 |
| 041 | [ educational services, namely, training related to the development and implementation of simulated combat training and consequence management exercises, namely, exercises related to responding to life threatening or destructive events; educational services, namely, training related to allied force modernization for combat, security and peacekeeping missions; ] educational services, namely, providing classes, seminars [ and workshops ] in the field of military combat, security and peacekeeping missions | ACTIVE | Mar 28, 1994 |
| 042 | [ military technical research and development for others in the field of technical warfare communications; ] engineering and design services in the fields of automatic revenue collection systems, surveying and electronic measuring equipment, communications systems, [ flight collision warning systems, ] and electronic tracking systems for others; consulting related to the design, development, engineering, operation and maintenance of software for computer systems for processing, authorizing and transferring data between point of sale devices and contactless smartcards, software related to smartcards, transport ticketing computer systems and software related to the sale and purchase of tickets; custom software design for others; engineering and software technical support services for the design, development, installation, and maintenance of computer software for combat simulation training systems, weapons effects analysis systems, and weapons simulation systems; engineering and software technical support services for the design, development and maintenance of computer software for automatic fare collection systems for rail, bus [, and parking lots ] ; consulting services with regard to the design and development of electronic fare collection systems; [ consultation and advice related to allied force modernization for combat, security and peacekeeping missions, namely, consultation and advice regarding the design and development of modern vehicles and computer systems for combat, security and peacekeeping missions; ] consulting related to the design, development, engineering and operation of [ computer hardware related to smartcards and ] computer hardware related to the sale and purchase of tickets; computer hardware technical support services for the design, development, and operation of combat simulation training systems, weapons effects analysis systems, and weapons simulation systems; computer hardware technical support services for the design, development, and operation of automatic fare collection systems for rail, bus [, and parking lots ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | security consultation and security advice related to the development and implementation of simulated combat training and consequence management exercises, namely, exercises related to responding to life threatening or destructive events; security consultation and security advice related to allied force modernization for combat, security and peacekeeping missions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cubic Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Cubic Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Cubic Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named CUBIC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2026 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jul 22, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 22, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2025 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 17, 2024 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2024 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 17, 2024 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 17, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 2, 2024 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2023 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2023 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Mar 15, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 15, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2023 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2021 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 25, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2021 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Feb 25, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2020 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2020 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 26, 2020 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2020 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Apr 24, 2020 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Apr 24, 2020 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 24, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 23, 2020 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 18, 2020 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2020 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2020 | NCS8 | NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SEC. 8 EMAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 16, 2019 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Aug 14, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 6, 2019 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 6, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 3, 2013 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 22, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 22, 2013 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 16, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 1, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 11, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 26, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 31, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 22, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 1, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2011 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 29, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 4, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 10, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |