Drawing for SAN

USPTO serial 77402050

SAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARTNER, JOHN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard C. Gilmore

Richard C. Gilmore MASCHOFF BRENNAN LAYCOCK GILMORE ISRAELSEN & WRIGH111 S. Main StreetSuite 600Salt Lake City, UT 84111

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Energy usage management in the field of electrical energy generated from renewable sources, including analyzing and forecasting electrical energy usageACTIVE—
037Installation and maintenance of solar photovoltaic installationsACTIVE—
038Electronic data transmissionACTIVE—
039Electricity storage and distributionACTIVE—
040Generation of electrical energy from renewable sourcesACTIVE—
042Technical planning of solar photovoltaic installations; data automation and collection service using software to identify, evaluate, analyze and collect dataACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 23, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 17, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 17, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 17, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 14, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 14, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 14, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 14, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 20, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 31, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 18, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 16, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 16, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 16, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 16, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 2, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 26, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance