USPTO serial 77402657
NOBILITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AGOSTO, GISELLE MARIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NOBILITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Lotions for strengthening the nails; Nail care preparations; Nail cream; Nail grooming products, namely, nail brushes, gel brush cleaner, bond, nail cleanser, nail overlay, artificial nail remover, nail strengthener | ACTIVE | Jan 27, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 17, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 3, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |