USPTO serial 77405014
HOTSHOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3864878Status 780Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 19, 2010
- Examiner
- SHOSHO II, ERNEST
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 117
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with HOTSHOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Maspeth, NY
Maspeth, NY
Maspeth, NY
Maspeth, NY
Maspeth, NY
Maspeth, NY
Hicksville, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven A. Abreu
Steven A. Abreu Sunstein LLP100 High StreetBOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | [ Cabinets used to control temperature and humidity for heating and proofing food goods; Electric cabinets used to control temperature and humidity for heating and proofing food goods ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 2009 |
| 021 | [ Cold packs used to keep food and drink cold; Drinking cups; Drinking flasks; Drinking flasks; Drinking glasses; Drinking horns; Drinking steins; Drinking vessels; Foam drink holders; Thermal insulated wrap for cans to keep the contents cold or hot ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 2009 |
| 029 | [ Drinking yogurts; Drinks based on yoghurt; Lactic acid bacteria drinks; Lactic acid drinks; Milk drinks containing fruits; Yoghurt drinks; ] Milk-based beverage containing coffee [ Preparations for making beverages, namely, dairy and vegetable based chocolate food beverages ] | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2009 |
| 030 | [ Chocolate-based ready-to-eat food bars; ] Cocoa; Coffee; [ Corn starch based drink, in the nature of a food beverage consisting primarily of maize and porridge; Ice cream drinks; Processed cereal-based food to be used as a breakfast food, snack for or ingredient for making other foods; ] Artificial coffee; Artificial coffee and tea; Beverages made of coffee; Caffeine-free coffee; [ Mixtures of coffee and chicory; ] Prepared coffee and coffee-based beverages [ Roasted coffee beans; Sugar-coated coffee beans; Preparations for making beverages, namely, coffee based beverages, iced tea, instant tea, and chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable based ] | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2009 |
| 032 | [ Bottled drinking water; Coffee-flavored soft drink; [ Colas; Concentrates, syrups or powders used in the preparation of soft drinks; Distilled drinking water; Drinking water; Energy drinks; Essences for use in making soft drinks; Fruit drinks; Fruit drinks and juices; Fruit flavored drinks; Fruit flavored soft drinks; Fruit flavoured drinks; Fruit juices and fruit drinks; Fruit-based soft drinks flavored with tea; Fruits drinks and fruit juices; Guarana drinks; Isotonic drinks; Pop; Powders used in the preparation of isotonic sports drinks and sports beverages; Preparations for making beverages, namely, coffee flavored soft drinks, soft drinks flavored with tea, non-alcoholic beverages with tea flavor; soft drinks, namely, ] soft drinks flavored with coffee, tea, chocolate ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 2009 |
| 043 | [ Coffee shops; Coffee supply services for offices; Coffee-house and snack-bar services; Office coffee supply services ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Di Bari, Leonard
- Other trademarks owned by Di Bari, Leonard
- Other trademarks owned by Di Bari, Leonard
- Other trademarks owned by Grossfeld, Daniel
- Other trademarks owned by Grossfeld, Daniel
- Other trademarks owned by Grossfeld, Daniel
- Other trademarks owned by HRTD HOLDINGS LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named HOTSHOT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2021 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2021 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 14, 2021 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Jun 14, 2021 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2021 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2020 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Mar 3, 2020 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 3, 2020 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 10, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 28, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2016 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 28, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 23, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 8, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 4, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 16, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 22, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 10, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2010 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 30, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 7, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 18, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 5, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |