USPTO serial 77405215
U SMILE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLEMAN, NICHOLAS A
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with U SMILE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John E. Ottaviani
JOHN E. OTTAVIANI EDWARDS ANGELL PALMER & DODGE LLP2800 Financial PlazaProvidence, RI 02903UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Oral care products, namely, toothpaste, teeth whitening toothpaste, tooth gel, teeth whitening gel, non-medicated mouth rinse, teeth whitening mouth rinse, teeth whitening gum, teeth whitening lozenge, teeth whitening wraps, teeth whitening strips, teeth whitening dissolving strips and denture cleanser; teeth whitening kit comprised of teeth whitening toothpaste, teeth whitening gel, teeth whitening mouth rinse, teeth whitening gum, teeth whitening lozenge, teeth whitening wraps, teeth whitening strips, teeth whitening dissolve strips, and toothbrush | ABANDONED | — |
| 021 | Oral care products, namely, dental floss; manual and electric toothbrushes | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 10, 2008 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 10, 2008 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 10, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |