Drawing for ON-TRAC

USPTO serial 77406236

ON-TRAC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STEIN, JAMES W
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ON-TRAC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Laura J. Zeman

LAURA J. ZEMAN SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.1 ARIZONA CENTER 400 E VAN BURENPHOENIX, AZ 85004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009software relating to parcel and package delivery services, namely, computer software enabling the preparation, administration and management of overnight parcel and package deliveries, the preparation and printing of shipment manifests and labels for overnight parcel and package deliveries, and access to shipping history and account activity reports, via global computer networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 5, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 5, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 21, 2010EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 23, 2009CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 20, 2009CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Sep 29, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 29, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 29, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 29, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 28, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 10, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 9, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 9, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Feb 29, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance