Drawing for PIGMAN

USPTO serial 77407505

PIGMAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PIGMAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bridget A. Sullivan

Bridget A. Sullivan Gurstel Chargo, P.A.6681 Country Club DriveGolden Valley, MN 55427UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Promoting the outdoor sportsman and hunting products of others through endorsements by a celebrityACTIVE
041Entertainment services, namely, providing an on-going television show featuring live game huntingACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 9, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 9, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 30, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Dec 29, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Dec 28, 2010TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
Dec 28, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Dec 28, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Nov 8, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 8, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 7, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Apr 29, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Apr 28, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Apr 28, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Apr 7, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Apr 7, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 7, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 7, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 5, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Oct 5, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Oct 5, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 7, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Apr 7, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Apr 7, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 7, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 15, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 25, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 11, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 11, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 11, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 11, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jun 11, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jun 11, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jun 11, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jun 7, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 4, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Mar 3, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance