USPTO serial 77407714
GURU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4326222Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 30, 2013
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GURU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WILTON, CT
DOREL HUNGARY LTD. LUXEMBOURG BRANCH
LUXEMBOURG, LU
Other trademarks owned by DOREL HUNGARY LTD. LUXEMBOURG BRANCH
DOREL HUNGARY LTD. LUXEMBOURG BRANCH
LUXEMBOURG, LU
Other trademarks owned by DOREL HUNGARY LTD. LUXEMBOURG BRANCH
DOREL HUNGARY LTD. LUXEMBOURG BRANCH
LUXEMBOURG, LU
Other trademarks owned by DOREL HUNGARY LTD. LUXEMBOURG BRANCH
CYCLES GURU INC./GURU CYCLES INC.
LAVAL, QUEBEC, CA
Guru Bicycle Manufacturing Inc.
Laval, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian G. Gilpin
Brian G. Gilpin Godfrey & Kahn, S.C.833 East Michigan Street, Suite 1800Milwaukee, WI 53202-5615UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CYCLING SPORTS GROUP, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DOREL HUNGARY LTD. LUXEMBOURG BRANCH
- Other trademarks owned by DOREL HUNGARY LTD. LUXEMBOURG BRANCH
- Other trademarks owned by DOREL HUNGARY LTD. LUXEMBOURG BRANCH
- Other trademarks owned by CYCLES GURU INC./GURU CYCLES INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Guru Bicycle Manufacturing Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named GURU
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 22, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 30, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 12, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 25, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 25, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 9, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 2, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 7, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |