USPTO serial 77408136
B ALIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with B ALIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Jung-gu, Seoul, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrea J. Mealey
ANDREA J. MEALEY EDWARDS ANGELL PALMER & DODGEPO BOX 130NEW YORK, NY 10150-0130UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Live performances, namely presentation of pantomime and dancing; presentation of Korean musical performances; management of theatres; digital imaging services; production of radio and television programs; presentation of dance performances; production of video films; production of shows; presentation of plays; theatre productions; organization of entertainment groups; entertainer services; distribution of films; exhibition of cinema films; film production; publication of books; publication of electronic books and journals on-line; providing on-line electronic, non-downloadable publications; organizations of exhibitions for cultural or educational purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 13, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 17, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |