Drawing for GFT

USPTO serial 77408648

GFT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BESCH, JAY C
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with GFT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jonthan D. Reichman

JONTHAN D REICHMAN KENYON & KENYON LLPONE BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004-1007UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Plumbing valves; plumbing fittings, namely, valvesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 6, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 6, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 28, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 23, 2011MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 23, 2011ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 23, 2011OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 23, 2011OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Aug 12, 2009OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 6, 2009ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 21, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 6, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 6, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 22, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 10, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 9, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 10, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 4, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance