USPTO serial 77408926
HARTFORD RESERVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4368750Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 16, 2013
- Examiner
- HESIK, APRIL ANNE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HARTFORD RESERVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc.
Montvale, NJ
Other trademarks owned by The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc.
The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc.
Montvale, NJ
Other trademarks owned by The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc.
The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc.
Montvale, NJ
Other trademarks owned by The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc.
MODESTO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle D. Kahn
Michelle D. Kahn Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLPFour Embarcadero Center, 17th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SAVE MART SUPERMARKETS
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named HARTFORD RESERVE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 16, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 19, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 12, 2013 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 6, 2013 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 30, 2013 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 29, 2013 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 14, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 30, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 25, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 25, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 28, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 16, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 18, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 12, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 24, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 15, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 26, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 3, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 30, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 27, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |