USPTO serial 77408993
GAME FACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHANG, KATHERINE S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GAME FACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nelson D Nolte
NELSON D NOLTE POLSTER LIEDER WOODRUFF & LUCCHESI LC12412 POWERSCOURT DR STE 200SAINT LOUIS, MO 63131-3615UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Open-faced protective face mask made from a hardened polycarbonate incorporating a strike bar for protecting the entire face of the wearer from impacts from balls in the sports of baseball, softball, soccer, flag football, lacrosse, and field hockey and incapable of protecting the eyes from liquid contaminants as in paintball activities | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2012 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 27, 2011 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Sep 23, 2011 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2011 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2011 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 20, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 27, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |