Drawing for PLATY

USPTO serial 77411402

PLATY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PLATY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen M. Evans

Stephen M. Evans SOUND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PLLCPO BOX 1972VASHON, WA 98070-1972UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Universal water purification filter unit adaptor cap assemblies and shower nozzle cap assemblies for outdoor recreational and travel usesACTIVE—
021Collapsible water bottles and reservoirs of various sizes sold empty; specialized collapsible water bottle caps; drinking tube cap assemblies; accessories to be used with collapsible water bottles and reservoirs, namely, closure caps, push-pull closure caps, and bite and suck valve assemblies; fabric and nylon webbing holsters, carriers, packs, and shoulder harnesses designed to carry collapsible water bottles and reservoirs; all of the foregoing for outdoor recreational and travel usesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 20, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2010UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jun 14, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 14, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 20, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 20, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 28, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 28, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 12, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 17, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 28, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 12, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 12, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 26, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 17, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 10, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 9, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 12, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 6, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance