USPTO serial 77411462
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Merivale, Christchurch, NZ
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Matthew Pritchard, Registration No. 46,228
J. MATTHEW PRITCHARD, REGISTRATION NO. 46,228 THE WEBB LAW FIRM436 7TH AVEPITTSBURGH, PA 15219-1826UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Apparatus for use in connection with the processing, recording, reproduction, transmission, and reception of electronic signals; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images; audio equipment; sound systems for use in motion picture theatres and other public performances theatres, halls and auditoriums; sound amplifying apparatus including loudspeakers and loudspeaker systems, amplifiers, preamplifiers; loudspeaker cabinets in this class; AM/FM tuners, digital tuners, tuners, transducers, loudspeaker horns, tweeters, woofers, subwoofers, mid-range loudspeakers, crossovers, digital signal, processors, sound processors, data processors, surround processors; computer software and hardware for audio and audiovisual recording, display, and playback; pre-recorded cinematographic films, DVDs and CD-ROMs; parts and fittings in this class for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |