CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for EARTHRIGHT

USPTO serial 77412311

EARTHRIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RITTNER, HANNO I
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EARTHRIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert R. Deleault

ROBERT R. DELEAULT MESMER & DELEAULT, PLLC41 BROOK STMANCHESTER, NH 03104-3599UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Flavored beverages, namely, vitamin enriched waterACTIVE—
032Flavored beverages, namely, coffee-flavored soft drinks, energy drinks, low calorie non-alcoholic beverages with coffee flavor, non-alcoholic beverages containing coffee, smoothies containing coffee, beer, and flavored waterACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 13, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 13, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 14, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2011EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 12, 2011EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 12, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 19, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 14, 2011TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jan 14, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 14, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 9, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 1, 2010TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Sep 1, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 1, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 16, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 13, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 9, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 8, 2010TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Mar 8, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 8, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 15, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 13, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 28, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 21, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 26, 2009TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Aug 26, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 26, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 17, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 13, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 13, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 21, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 1, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 16, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 16, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 8, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 5, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 5, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 5, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 13, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 8, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Mar 7, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance