CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for PERC RAVEN

USPTO serial 77413555

PERC RAVEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PERC RAVEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Maurice B. Pilosof

MAURICE B. PILOSOF MAURICE B. PILOSOF, ESQ.PO BOX 691937WEST HOLLYWOOD, CA 90069-8937UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for programming and developing embedded systems, and for real time virtual machine software development tools therefor, namely, computer software for the creation, analysis, design, coding and testing of embedded systems softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 12, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 12, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 30, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 15, 2011TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Aug 15, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 15, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 13, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 12, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 1, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 11, 2011TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 11, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 11, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 13, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 12, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 28, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 2, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 1, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 12, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 12, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 12, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 12, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 12, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 12, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 17, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 28, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 13, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 5, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 20, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 20, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2008GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 20, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 20, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 10, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance