Drawing for BROOKLYN SUPERHERO SUPPLY CO.

USPTO serial 77413875

BROOKLYN SUPERHERO SUPPLY CO.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BOAGNI, MARY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BROOKLYN SUPERHERO SUPPLY CO.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patricia L. Werner

POU I BONNIE LEE BRYAN CAVE LLP1290 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10104-0101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035retail store services featuring costumes, toys, games and playthingsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 7, 2012MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 6, 2012ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 6, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 9, 2011GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2011GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2011CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 29, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 16, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 15, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 9, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 9, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 9, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 23, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 23, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 23, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 13, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 13, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 16, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 16, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 16, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 13, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 13, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 13, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 13, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 23, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 22, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 21, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 10, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance