USPTO serial 77414420
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott S. Havlick
SCOTT S. HAVLICK HOLLAND & HART LLPPO BOX 8749DENVER, CO 80201-8749UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Leather bags for merchandise packaging; Clothing for domestic pets; Traveling bags of leather and imitation leather; All purpose sports bags; Athletic bags; Garment bags for travel; Valises; Briefcases; Pouches of leather and imitation leather; Drawstring pouches; Felt pouches; Backpacks; Handbags; Shoulder bags; Shopping bags of leather and imitation leather; Wheeled shopping bags; Vanity cases sold empty; Tote bags; Beach bags; School satchels; Purses; Wallets; Business card cases; Credit card cases; Umbrellas; Parasols | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts; tee-shirts; Polo shirts; Blouses; Tank tops; Camisoles; Sweatshirts; Pullovers; Vests; Sweaters; Cardigans; Jackets; Dresses; Parkas; Coats; Pants; Sweatpants; Overalls; Rompers; Creepers; Trousers; Shorts; Skirts; Underwear; Pajamas; Japanese traditional clothing, namely, kimono, obi sashes and happy coats; Swimwear; Swimming caps; Socks; Stockings; Cloth bibs; Aprons; Ties; Scarves; Mufflers; Bandannas; Gloves; Wristbands; Hats; Caps; Sun visors; Belts; Suspenders; Footwear; Sneakers; Sandals; Pumps; Slippers; Japanese style wooden clogs | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 17, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 3, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 28, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 14, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 5, 2008 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 5, 2008 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 5, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 3, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |