Drawing for MONTAGE

USPTO serial 77414629

MONTAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LIWINSKI, HELENE AGNES
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MONTAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edgar A. Zarins

EDGAR A. ZARINS MASCO CORPORATION21001 VAN BORN RDTAYLOR, MI 48180-1300UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021BATHROOM ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, TOWEL BARS, TOWEL RINGS, TOILET TISSUE HOLDERS AND TUMBLER-TOOTHBRUSH HOLDERS, EXCLUDING WALL MIRRORSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 4, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 4, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 4, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 4, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 4, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 1, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 17, 2009ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Apr 2, 2009ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 11, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 23, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 23, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 9, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 8, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 8, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 8, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 6, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 5, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 26, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 11, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance