Drawing for FOXYP2

USPTO serial 77414664

FOXYP2

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GLASSER, CARYN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FOXYP2?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Aaron Hendelman

AARON HENDELMAN WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI650 PAGE MILL RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009DVDs, CDs, and computer software featuring language and related educational instruction materials; cellular telephones; handheld computersACTIVE—
016Language and education training books and manuals in the field of language instructionACTIVE—
041Language instruction; educational instruction, namely, conducting informal on-line programs in language learning and instruction, and printable materials distributed therewith; educational instruction, namely, providing courses of instruction at the secondary and college level and distribution of course material in connection therewith; providing facilities for language and educational instruction; language learning and educational television and radio programming, namely, production of television and radio programs in the fields of language learning and related instruction; providing an ongoing television program in the field of language learning and related instructionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 28, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 28, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 26, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 3, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 11, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 26, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 26, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 14, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 14, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 9, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 16, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 9, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 12, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Mar 11, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance