Drawing for LAUREL ISLAND PLANTATION

USPTO serial 77414973

LAUREL ISLAND PLANTATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINGLE, JAMES W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LAUREL ISLAND PLANTATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jonathan R. Smith

William H. Brewster Kilpatrick Stockton LLP1100 Peachtree Street, Suite 2800Atlanta, GA 30309-4530UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing real estate leads for prospective purchasers; Real estate advertising services; Real estate marketing services in the field of homes; Real estate marketing services, namely, on-line services featuring tours of residential and commercial real estate; Real estate sales managementACTIVE—
037Housing services, namely, development of real property and new construction; Real estate development; Real estate site selectionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 21, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 21, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 8, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Sep 7, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 7, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 16, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 16, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 16, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 24, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 4, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 22, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 21, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 19, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 19, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 19, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 15, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 15, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 15, 2008CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 15, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 14, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 14, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 16, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 12, 2008MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Mar 11, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance