USPTO serial 77415033
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Theodore A. Breiner
THEODORE A. BREINER BREINER & BREINER, L.L.C.P.O. BOX 320160ALEXANDRIA, VA 22320-0160UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Credit union services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2010 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 16, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 16, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | RGTT | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2009 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 2, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |