USPTO serial 77415092
M
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3748136Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 16, 2010
- Examiner
- FRYE, KIMBERLY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with M?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary Catherine Merz
MARY CATHERINE MERZ MERZ & ASSOCIATES, P.C.1010 LAKE ST. , SUITE 304OAK PARK, IL 60301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Children's clothes, namely, pants, tee shirts, jackets, one piece dresses, jumpers and coats; capes; jumpers; jackets; jeans; babies' clothes, namely, gloves, hats and caps, cloth diapers, sweaters, socks, stockings, undershirts, pajamas, jackets, shirts, playsuits, pants, cloth bibs, rubber pants, low shoes, boots, rain shoes, winter shoes, basketball shoes, sandals, vinyl shoes, leather shoes, and slippers, skirts, blouses, overcoats, jumpers, overalls, girls dresses, vests, parkas and shawls, stoles, tops; swimming suits; night wear; socks; hats; leather shoes; low shoes; boots; sandals; tee shirts; neckties; winter gloves; waterproof clothes, namely, raincoats, jackets; braces for clothing, namely, suspenders; leather belts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by E.LAND RETAIL LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by WITHUS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by WITHUS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by WITHUS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named M
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 1, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 26, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 29, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |