Drawing for ATHLETE REDEFINED

USPTO serial 77415403

ATHLETE REDEFINED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHARPER JR, SAM
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ATHLETE REDEFINED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brendan P. McFeely

Brendan P. McFeely Kane Kessler, P.C.1350 Avenue of the Americas26th FloorNew York, NY 10019

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Travel bags; luggage; all purpose carry bags; handbags; beach bags; tote bags; sports bags; gym bags; duffel bags; fanny packs; school bags; backpacks; leather bags; purses; wallets; satchels; brief cases; attaché cases; suitcases; key cases; umbrellasACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, shirts, t-shirts, sweatshirts, pants, jackets, socks, caps, hats and beanies; Shoes; boots; snowboard boots; sandalsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 23, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 19, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 19, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 5, 2009EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 21, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 21, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 8, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 23, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 23, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 23, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 7, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 7, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 7, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 24, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 24, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 19, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 18, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 18, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 18, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 18, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 11, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance