USPTO serial 77415909
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Bentonville, AR
Bentonville, AR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James F. Lea, III
JAMES F. LEA, III FELLERS SNIDER BLANKENSHIP BAILEY TIPPENS321 S BOSTON AVE STE 800TULSA, OK 74103-3318UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Cutlery and flatware, namely, knives, forks, and spoons, both plastic and non-plastic; lawn and garden hand tools, namely, trowels, clippers, nippers, shears, shovels, spades, hoes, rakes, cultivators, hand tillers, pruners, snippers, saws, and lawn aerators | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Painting supplies, namely, paint brushes, paint rollers, paint sponges, paint roller covers, edgers, and paint trays | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Paint shields, namely, plastic cloths and tarps to cover and protect objects while painting | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Kitchen utensils, namely, tongs, spatulas, grill brushes/scrapers, basters, skewers, two-prong forks, grill baskets, and ladles; drinking glasses and cups, paper cups, and plastic cups; cookware, namely, pots, pans, skillets, casserole dishes, dutch ovens, braising pots, double boilers, griddles, non-electric pressure cookers, roasting pans, woks, steamers, bakeware, and aluminum foil disposable pans, cleaning supplies, namely, cleaning cloths, sponges, scrubbers, scrub brushes, steel wool, brooms, mops, dusters, dustpans, buckets, toilet brushes, empty spray bottles, squeegees, and rubber gloves; plastic storage containers for household or domestic use; and watering cans | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 26, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 7, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 24, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 30, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |