USPTO serial 77416725
CREATE YOUR OWN CURRENCY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LATTUCA, FRANK J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CREATE YOUR OWN CURRENCY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Professional business consulting services; business planning services; business development services, namely, providing start-up support for businesses of others; accounting services; internet based consulting services, namely, providing start-up support for businesses of others; internet based business planning services; internet based accounting services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 20, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 25, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 12, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 27, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 28, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 25, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2009 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 14, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 17, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |