USPTO serial 77417928
AGOO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AGOO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vancouver, BC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Trisha A. Dore
TRISHA A. DORE ACCUPRO TRADEMARK SERVICES LLP401 WEST GEORGIA STREETSUITE 702VANCOUVER, BC, V6B5A1Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Baby, infant and children's sleeping sacks | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Baby, infant and children's clothing, namely, shirts, pants, t-shirts, windbreakers, coats, tights, dresses, shorts, tops, vests, blouses, wrap skirts, wrap tops, leggings, track suits, turtlenecks, tanks, boxers, briefs, underpants, undershirts, jumpers, cargos, overalls, sweaters, hoodies, pajamas, onezies, bibs not of paper, hats, beanies, and socks. Sleepwear, namely, under shirts, body suits, onezies, nightgowns, pajamas tops, pajama bottoms, footed sleepers, shorts, and layettes; UV protective garments, namely, shirts, pants, t-shirts, windbreakers, coats, tights, dresses, shorts, tops, vests, blouses, wrap skirts, wrap tops, leggings, track suits, turtlenecks, tanks, boxers, briefs, underpants, undershirts, jumpers, cargos, overalls, sweaters, hoodies, hats, beanies, bibs not of paper, onezies, and socks; Outerwear, namely, jackets, vests, overcoats, overalls, windbreakers, ski jackets, rain jackets, rain pants, hoodies, outer jackets, overalls, pants, hats, mitts, scarves, coats, slickers, and ski suits. Undergarments, namely, tops, tanks, shirts, t-shirts, boxers, briefs, leggings, panties, thongs, shirts, pants, tat pants, and sleeveless shirts; Baby, infant and children's footwear; Baby, infant and children's toques, hats, bibs not of paper, scarves, bandanas and headbands | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services featuring baby, infant and children's clothing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 29, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 25, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 30, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 13, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 11, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |