USPTO serial 77418453
SATURATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HODGES, KOURTNEE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SATURATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Viet X. Do
Rosanna Eusebio3523 Eastham DriveCulver City, CA 90232UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics, namely, eye color, makeup, eye shadow, eyeliner, eyebrow pencil, eye pencil, lip gloss, lipstick, non-medicated lip balm, mascara, nail polish, blush, concealer, compacts, artificial eyelashes, artificial fingernails, nail polish top coat, nail polish base coat, lip foundation, eyebrow gloss, lash primer, brow primer, lip primer, eye primer, face primer, eye brightener gel, eye brightener cream, color correctors, tinted moisturizers, liquid foundation, cream foundation, power foundation, shine control gel, facial blotting papers, bronzers, eye shadow, pressed eye shadow, loose eye shadow, cream eye shadow, liquid eye shadow, mousse eye shadow, eyeshadow base, eyeliner, liquid eyeliner, eyeliner pencil, gel eyeliner, cream eyeliner, powder eyeliner, mascara, mascara primer, waterproof mascara, false eyelashes, false eyelash adhesive, eyebrow tint, eyebrow gel, eyebrow powder, eyebrow filler, lip gloss, lip plumper, lipstick, lip stain, lip pencil, gel lip color, cheek color, cream blush, powder blush, gel blush, mousse blush, blush, illuminizer, namely, a cream or powder makeup containing a shimmer, and nail treatment; skin care products, namely, astringent for cosmetic purposes, bath gel, bath oil, bath powder, beauty mask, body lotion, bubble bath, eye cream, skin moisturizer, essential oils for personal use, make-up remover, facial scrubs, and skin emollients, facial cleansers, toners/astringent, facial moisturizer, facial cream, eye treatments, namely, eye gels and eye lotions, non-medicated lip treatments, anti-aging face treatment cream, anti-aging eye treatment cream, facial scrub, facial exfoliant, facial masks, non-medicated skin revitalizers, skin lighteners, face night treatment cream and oil control face treatment lotion; fragrances, namely, spray fragrances, solid fragrances, roll-on fragrances; bath and body products, namely, body cleansers, body moisturizers, body lotion, body cream, body treatments, namely, body powder, exfolients and scrub; hair products, namely, shampoo, dry shampoo, conditioner, non-medicated scalp treatment cream and styling gels | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 11, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 24, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 26, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 26, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 14, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 24, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |