USPTO serial 77418490
BAYBRIDGE DECISION TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 7, 2008
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BAYBRIDGE DECISION TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Bay Bridge Decision Technologies, Inc.
Annapolis, MD
Other trademarks owned by Bay Bridge Decision Technologies, Inc.
Bay Bridge Decision Technologies, Inc.
Annapolis, MD
Other trademarks owned by Bay Bridge Decision Technologies, Inc.
Bay Bridge Decision Technologies, Inc.
Annapolis, MD
Other trademarks owned by Bay Bridge Decision Technologies, Inc.
INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE, INC.
INDIANAPOLIS, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marta L. Paul
Marta L. Paul Woodard, Emhardt, Moriarty, McNett & Henry LLP111 Monument CircleSuite 3700Indianapolis, IN 46204-5137Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for planning and analysis of the performance and operations of customer support contact centers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 25, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bay Bridge Decision Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Bay Bridge Decision Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Bay Bridge Decision Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named BAYBRIDGE DECISION TECHNOLOGIES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 21, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 20, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 29, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |