CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for CAREADVANCE

USPTO serial 77418929

CAREADVANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CAREADVANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for health care plan management and administrationACTIVE—
042Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for health care plan management and administration; implementation, maintenance and support of computer softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 13, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 13, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 25, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 22, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2010TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 20, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 13, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 12, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 18, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 17, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 12, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 12, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 27, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 26, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 25, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 11, 2010TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 11, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 11, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 14, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 12, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 12, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 17, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 28, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 12, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 8, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 8, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 5, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 5, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 23, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 23, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 23, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 9, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 20, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 18, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Mar 17, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance