Drawing for BENEFACTORS

USPTO serial 77419164

BENEFACTORS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BIBBINS, ODESSA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BENEFACTORS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dietary and nutritional supplements; Dietary food supplementsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 18, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 18, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 17, 2015GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2015GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2015CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 14, 2015RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 13, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 9, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 9, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 2015ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2014GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2014GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2014CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 2, 2014RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 26, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 22, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 3, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 20, 2014ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2013GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2013GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2013CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 12, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 11, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 11, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 11, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 21, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 18, 2012ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2012GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2012GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2012CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 13, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 12, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 7, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 17, 2011ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2011GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2011GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2011CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 17, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 15, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 11, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 23, 2010ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2010GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2010GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2010CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Dec 9, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 5, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 24, 2009ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
May 27, 2009GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 27, 2009GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 27, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
May 7, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 7, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 7, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 6, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 6, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 31, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 17, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance