CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for LIVIT

USPTO serial 77419530

LIVIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHUO, EMILY M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIVIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barry L. Kelmachter

BARRY L. KELMACHTER BACHMAN & LAPOINTE, P.C.SUITE 1201900 CHAPEL STREETNEW HAVEN, CT 06510

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039Tourist services, namely, reservations and organization of trips, escorting tourists, organization of excursions and ticket reservations for travel and toursACTIVE—
043Services for the reservation of hotels, accommodations and hostelsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 5, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 5, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 3, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 9, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 19, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 11, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 11, 2008COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 3, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 24, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 10, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Oct 2, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 1, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 24, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 24, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 22, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 17, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 12, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 11, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 11, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 27, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2008COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 19, 2008MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Mar 18, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance