USPTO serial 77420223
GUARANTEED RETIREMENT INCOME PORTFOLIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, LESLIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GUARANTEED RETIREMENT INCOME PORTFOLIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard J. Shire
HOWARD J SHIRE KENYON & KENYON LLPONE BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | financial planning; investment management and investment consulting services for others except in the field of insurance; stock brokerage; investment brokerage except in the field of insurance; investment advice except in the field of insurance; wealth management; mutual fund management; financial research services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2012 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 30, 2011 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 2, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 18, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 18, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 12, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |